Trump signs executive order to dismantle Department of Education, triggering concerns over impact on American education system.

In Short

President Trump has signed an executive order to start closing the Department of Education, stating education should be managed at the state level.

The decision has raised concerns among education advocates about the potential negative impact on federal education programs and student access.

President Trump signed an executive order on Thursday to begin the process of closing the Department of Education.

This move aligns with his ongoing campaign promise, although specific details were not provided at the signing ceremony.

The order follows a recent announcement from the department about plans to reduce its workforce significantly, raising concerns about the future of numerous federal education programs.

During the signing ceremony, Trump stated that education should be managed at the state level. He assured that critical funding for low-income schools, special needs students, and Pell Grants would be maintained and redistributed to other agencies.

Trump explained the urgency of dismantling the department, asserting that it is not beneficial to the American education system.

In response to this decision, education advocates expressed strong concerns, warning that abolishing the department could disrupt the education system and negatively affect students.

They argue that without federal oversight, college access could decline, student loan defaults could rise, and unscrupulous institutions could exploit students.

Leaders agree to Middle East negotiations and energy infrastructure ceasefire.

A pivotal 90-minute conversation between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin could mark a crucial step toward ending the war in Ukraine.

The White House confirmed that the two leaders agreed to begin immediate negotiations in the Middle East and implement a ceasefire on energy infrastructure.

Trump described the discussion as “very good and productive,” noting that both Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy are eager to see the conflict come to an end.

“Many elements of a Contract for Peace were discussed,” Trump said on Truth Social, adding that the process to end the war is now “in full force and effect.”

As part of the talks, Putin reportedly agreed to a mutual 30-day pause on strikes targeting energy facilities and ordered Russian forces to comply.

In a further sign of potential de-escalation, Moscow has pledged to return 23 seriously wounded Ukrainian soldiers to Kyiv as a goodwill gesture.

While Trump remains optimistic about progress, he acknowledged that “many elements of a Final Agreement” still need to be resolved.

As diplomatic efforts intensify, global attention is now focused on whether negotiations in the Middle East can pave the way for a lasting ceasefire and eventual peace deal.

Ira Chaleff, a political commentator, bi-partisan leader in Congress, and author, “How To Stop a Tyrant: The Power of Political Followers to Make or BRAKE a Toxic Leader” joins Veronica Dudo to discuss.

Trump’s upcoming trade policies may significantly impact Australia’s economy, with potential reciprocal tariffs and implications for key exports.

In Short

Donald Trump plans to introduce new trade policies that could adversely affect the Australian economy, particularly through potential tariffs on imports. Australia may need to strengthen trade ties with other nations amidst these challenges, while adjusting its trade strategy over the next few years.

Donald Trump is set to unveil new trade policies that may significantly impact the Australian economy. This forthcoming trade review from the USTR is expected on April 1st, with policies to potentially include reciprocal tariffs targeting nations with value-added taxes, such as Australia.

Australia’s exports, predominantly agricultural, could face challenges. Concerns primarily revolve around potential tariffs on U.S. imports, which include industrial machinery, cars, and pharmaceuticals. A price increase on these imports by 10% could strain Australian consumers.

In terms of exports to the United States, beef represents a critical item. However, there should be viable alternatives in other Asian markets. Historical shifts in weather and supply have allowed Australian agricultural exports to find outlets even amidst disruptions.

The focus remains on the implications of new tariffs on imports. There is pressure for Australia to implement reciprocal tariffs, which could heighten living costs for consumers, especially affecting software and other services.

Establishing stronger trade relationships with nations like China and the EU may be necessary. However, ongoing tensions with China complicate this process, while strict European regulations present additional challenges.

With the Trump administration expected to continue its policies for the next three and a half years, Australia’s trade strategy may need to adapt while seeking alternative partnerships. The outcome of these efforts remains uncertain.